Showing posts with label latest cricket news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label latest cricket news. Show all posts

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Afridi disappointed with Butt's 'petty' statements

Shahid Afridi has said he was disappointed by the "petty things" PCB chairman Ijaz Butt brought up while justifying Afridi's axing as Pakistan's one-day captain.



"I am disappointed because such petty things coming from the head of the board were unwarranted," Afridi told the Daily Times. "He himself made me captain, and everyone, from experts to fans, had praised my leadership and the unity in the team."

Afridi led Pakistan to the semi-finals of the 2011 World Cup, their best performance at cricket's flagship one-day event since 1999. After that, he led Pakistan to an unassailable 3-0 lead in the five-match one-day series in the West Indies before a selection meeting bust-up between him and coach Waqar Younis sparked off a controversy. Pakistan went on to lose the two dead rubber games, and Afridi was stripped of the one-day captaincy. He responded by announcing a "conditional retirement" from the game.

Last week, Butt defended the move to axe Afridi by blaming him for the losses in the West Indies, and deeming him as "not captaincy material", in an interview with Geo Super television channel.

Afridi, who is currently in England playing in the Friends Life t20 tournament, said he would consult with his lawyers before planning his next move. "I will unmask all these people who are running a smear campaign against me," he said. "I don't want to say anything right now because I am enjoying my time with Hampshire but when I return I will respond to them."

Meanwhile, Afridi's legal counsel, Syed Ali Zaffar, said the player would have a case if he chose to take Butt to court over his statements. "Ijaz Butt's statement that Shahid Afridi will not captain the Pakistan team again is not only very irresponsible but is like an order or direction to the governing council members [who choose the captain in consultation with the board chairman] and to the selection committee not to even consider him," Zaffar told the Nation. "In this regard, Mr Butt is usurping the authority of the governing council members and selection committee and is clearly acting illegally.

"Afridi can take him to court if he so chooses. I will however add that I have had no discussion with Afridi in this regard. Mr Ijaz Butt is a loose cannon. Under Pakistan Cricket Board's constitution the chairman virtually enjoys dictatorial powers."

Gutsy Chanderpaul denies India

India will have to wait until 2016 to win more than one Test in a series in the Caribbean - a feat they've never achieved and were denied this time due to a resistance led by their West Indian tormentor-in-chief Shivnarine Chanderpaul. He grafted his way to a 23rd Test century and was supported by Fidel Edwards in a decisive 37-over grind that made India rue their lack of effectiveness with the ball.

Even though Chanderpaul's partners failed to match his patience and eventually conceded their wickets to set a target of 180 in 47 overs, timely breakthroughs in the chase meant India's priorities switched from forcing a win to securing their 1-0 lead. A day that began with the visitors in complete control, ended with West Indies achieving parity thanks, fittingly, to a batsman who became their most-capped Test player in this match.

India's late inroads on the fourth day, the fortuitous wicket of Darren Sammy - caught at short leg off a deflection from his chest - on the fifth morning and the subsequent run-out of Ravi Rampaul boosted their chances of wrapping up the game quickly. But Chanderpaul blocked out one end completely. He saw off the seamers with ease, driving and clipping them away for runs early and displaying solid defence and farming the strike when Edwards joined him. Unshakeable at one end, he forced the Indian bowlers to turn their focus completely towards Edwards, whose vigil guided Chanderpaul through to another landmark.

Chanderpaul had been dropped on 25 by Rahul Dravid on the fourth day and offered another chance in his 90s - a brief phase where was troubled by the turn and Harbhajan Singh's round-the-wicket line. He edged Harbhajan a couple of times past slip, once very narrowly past Dravid but reached his century with a tickle off Ishant Sharma and celebrated with a ritual kiss to the Windsor Park surface, much to the joy of a raucous Sunday crowd in the venue's first ever Test.

India's seamers shone for much of the series, including the first innings where they kept probing away, but they faltered today in good batting conditions. They didn't vary their lengths, and bowled too short: Ishant had the better of Sammy thrice in this series by pitching the ball on a length, but rarely did that today; instead, in his very first over, he was slashed for two boundaries. Munaf Patel roughed up Edwards early in his innings, whacking him on the ear when he missed a hook, but the bowlers repeated the dose too often after the batsman had learnt his lesson. Spin was India's hope, with the ball spitting on the odd occasion and though it yielded success, it came long after India desired it.

While Chanderpaul weathered most of the bowling, Edwards, who arrived with the lead just 113, showed he was adept at handling the short-ball barrage, knocking them down off the back foot, swaying out of the way quickly and showing the full face to both the seamers and Harbhajan when they bowled fuller. When Praveen Kumar found a bit of reverse, he drove him through the line after getting to the pitch, and negotiated the turn and bounce despite a cluster of close-in fielders on the leg side. He offered India hope, however, with some needless extravagance. He smashed a slower one from Ishant over mid-off and swung another over midwicket. Having got away on a couple of occasions, he was third time unlucky when Suresh Raina forced another loose shot to mid-off. Devendra Bishoo edged a catch to slip shortly after, leaving Chanderpaul stranded when he'd have been hoping to frustrate India further.

Edwards' performance did fire him up however, and he bowled with fierce pace, and got dangerous swing with the new ball. Abhinav Mukund was trapped in front first ball, playing across the line and Dravid was unsettled by some scorchers that he erred by playing at. He survived a stormy first spell with M Vijay, who put India on course with fluent batting in conditions that considerably eased out after tea.

Singles were easy to come by, and the bad balls were comfortably dispatched. Vijay took Sammy for a couple of boundaries, including one that was off his favourite swing over midwicket, while Dravid punished Bishoo's half-tracker first up, prompting the bowler to switch to a round-the-wicket line outside leg stump. That had an effect on Vijay, who, after playing out five such deliveries in an over, felt the urge to employ a cross-batted heave off Ravi Rampaul's first ball of a new spell. He miscued it to mid-on, but the chase was still on with Raina promoted up the order. Though he infused the innings with some urgency, running smartly between the wickets, his stay, and India's hopes of a successful chase, ended when he scooped a catch back to Rampaul. The captains ended the game at the first opportunity just before the mandatory 15 overs began.

In the end, MS Dhoni was satisfied with a 1-0 result, but could India have rounded off with a stronger statement of intent ahead of a tougher assignment in England? For West Indies, too, this was a satisfactory end. The start of the season was marred by the spat between senior players, including Chris Gayle, and the board. But a Test win over Pakistan led by their under-pressure captain Sammy, two draws against India secured from positions of weakness, the rise of Rampaul, the successful return of Edwards, the impressive debut of Kirk Edwards and Chanderpaul's evergreen reliability were all welcome results.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Dilshan's comments on not wanting to tour Pak insensitive: Qadir

LAHORE: Former leg-spinner Abdul Qadir and ex-Chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board, Lt General (retd) Tauqir Zia, have lashed out at Sri Lankan captain Tillakaratne Dilshan for saying he does not want to tour the troubled country again.

Dilshan has upset the Pakistani cricket community with his comments after the Sri Lanka Cricket turned down an invitation to play a scheduled Test series here later this year.

Dilshan was a member of the Sri Lankan team that was attacked by terrorists in March, 2009. The attack on the Lankan team bus claimed seven lives including that of the bus driver and left five of the visiting players injured.

Welcoming the decision of his board to not travel to the country, Dilshan on Thursday told reporters in Cardiff that he would never go back to Pakistan.

"I don't think so. It was a bad experience for me as a cricketer in Pakistan. As a player, I don't want to go through the same experience in the future. My personal view, I don't want to go back to play cricket there," Dilshan said.

Zia, who led the PCB from 1999 to 2003, said Dilshan's comments were insensitive to the problems being faced by the Pakistani people on Friday.

"I don't think he had any business airing his personal views on a public forum like this. Once the Sri Lankan board had turned down our invitation there was no need for such comments," Zia said.

The former PCB chief felt the matter needed to be taken up with the Sri Lankan board as Dilshan's comments will only hurt any remote chances that Pakistan might have of hosting an international event again.

"The invitation sent by Pakistan was based on an improvement in the security situation in the country until the Osama bin Laden incident took place. No country is immune to terrorism these days. Dilshan's comments were insensitive," he added.

Qadir, who has also remained a chief selector, said the batsman's comments didn't reflect the history of good ties between Pakistan and Sri Lanka.

"Pakistan has always been a big supporter of Sri Lankan cricket. We went and played there regularly even when Sri Lanka was in a state of war.

"We went and played there even when other teams refused to play in Sri Lanka during the 1996 World Cup. I don't think this guy (Dilshan) has any inkling even of what Pakistan and Sri Lanka have done for each other in the past," Qadir said.

He added Dilshan had no business expressing his personal views in public.

"Even if he does not want to come and play in Pakistan fair enough. We can understand that Sri Lankan players will be reluctant to come after the incident two years back. But to portray Pakistan as a country where international players would not like to play is unfair on us," he said.

The PCB has not reacted officially to the refusal but officials here admit they were expecting it given the spate of terrorist attacks in the country since the death of Osama bin Laden.

England missed Collingwood the bowler and the slip fielder

While England might not miss Paul Collingwood's runs this summer, they need to find someone to take those flying catches in the slips, and to bowl occasionally rewarding medium-pace, says David Lloyd in the Independent. The policy of playing only four bowlers also needs to be debated in the light of evidence from the Cardiff Test, he writes.

Collingwood probably dropped too many chances throughout the course of a long Test career to be mentioned in the same breath as South Africa's Jonty Rhodes when it comes to truly great fielders of the modern area. But he did hold any number of stupendous catches that left his team-mates open-mouthed in admiration.

Now, whether Collingwood would have held the two edges that flashed close to Alastair Cook – new filler of the third slip slot – is impossible to tell. Experience tells us, though, that he probably would have snaffled one of them, and quite possibly have reacted more quickly than Eoin Morgan did at point when a miscue landed fractionally short of him.

In the Daily Mail, Nasser Hussain writes that England have succeeded with a four-man attack largely due to the brilliance of Graeme Swann, but taking 20 wickets could get tougher during the winter. He hopes that England find a way to get Samit Patel into the side to improve the balance.

Steady drizzle washes out morning session

Sri Lanka's ambitions to make further inroads into England's first innings were thwarted on the third morning in Cardiff, as steady drizzle meant no play in the first session and an early lunch was called for 12.30. The covers remained firmly in place although the prospects for play look a little better later in the afternoon.

It meant the visitors had to wait to build on their excellent display yesterday where they reached 400 then claimed Andrew Strauss's wicket in the final over of the day to leave England 47 for 1. Prasanna Jayawardene was the star performer with his third Test hundred in a resilient display from Sri Lanka's batsmen.

The most significant news on the third morning was that James Anderson won't bowl again in the Test after being diagnosed with a grade one side strain. He spent most of the last session yesterday off the field and went for a scan after play. However, he will be able to resume his role of nightwatchman when play does get underway although is unlikely to be fit for the second Test at Lord's next week.

A match-up that's worth the wait?

It's taken 73 games, but we're finally here. Seventy-three. Chew on that number for a moment. The IPL has had 50% more games than World Cup 2011, which was faulted for being too long. It's had 16 games more than the first three World Cups combined. The IPL has tested viewer appetite and player endurance to the limit, in the process turning the less-is-more norm on its head. The audience has spoken: there is only so much cricket India can take. The players have started breaking under the strain: several overseas signings flew home early, the India squad going to West Indies is severely depleted. Seventy-three is a big number.

The verdict, though, can wait until No. 74 is out of the way. An exciting knockout phase is capable of glossing over all the faults of a bloated tournament, and IPL 2011 has been fortunate on that front - Bangalore's hammering of Mumbai in the virtual semi-final notwithstanding. The impact of a good, well-contested final can be even more far-reaching. The success of the most recent World Cup, and the equally resounding failure of the one that preceded it, are quite closely linked to the manner in which the final moments of the respective events panned out. For three years running, the IPL final has been a closely fought game. Can 2011 continue the trend?

Chennai Super Kings and Royal Challengers Bangalore are opponents capable of producing that gripping denouement. Going by where they finished in the league table, they are the two best sides in the tournament. Both sides have been incredibly consistent, which is a considerable achievement in a tournament that goes on forever. Skeptics will point at Bangalore's dependence on Chris Gayle, and Chennai's dependence on home advantage. The former is a disservice to Virat Kohli and Bangalore's well-rounded bowling attack, while the latter betrays a poor grasp of the roller-coaster ways of Twenty20 - winning seven games on the trot at the same venue in this format is no mean achievement, regardless of the conditions.

Chennai and Bangalore have a storied Twenty20 history: in the one season when Chennai did not make the final (2009), it was Bangalore who stopped them in the semis. Chennai returned the favour in Champions League 2010, hustling their South-Indian neighbours out of contention. This year, they have traded blows three times already, with Chennai leading 2-1.

IPL 2011 has thrown everything at us, and the feeling at the end of it all is one of gluttonous excess. A cracking final, witnessed by a full house, and featuring good cricket (and that doesn't always mean scores of 200 from both sides) might be a good way to sign off. A Super Over finish will be "just what the doctor ordered".